Banned!

When dealing with Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, Parler, these apps and computer services are owned and operated by private companies. Although these applications have created a public forum for all sorts of speech, these applications are not operated by the local, state, or federal governments. In fact, these apps are exclusively run by private companies.
Being private companies, these entities can change and alter what types of speech will or will not be tolerated. Contrary to popular sentiment, private companies can limit, restrict, or outright ban certain speech, topics, or speakers.

Stickler for the Rules: Criminal Laws Must be Strictly Construed to Be Fair

Our system of government (whether at the federal or state levels) relies on interrelationship between the branches. These interrelationships create a system of checks and balances between the three branches of government. Each branch has its own lane. In its simplest formulation, the legislature writes the laws. The executive carries out the laws. The judiciary interprets the laws. And that is the way it is. The idea is that no one branch is more powerful than any other and all must work together to sustain our democratic form of government. See Art. II, Sec. 3, Fla. Const. (1968 Revision). Click http://www.ihearyoubarking.com for more info.

“Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” not so Tasty

Although based in the language of the Fourth Amendment, the exclusionary rule remedy grew out of an understanding of fairness and purpose. If the government could prosecute someone with illegally obtained evidence, then what exactly was the purpose of the Fourth Amendment? And how was that fair? What did the Fourth Amendment protect if it could not be enforced on its face? Obviously, the government could not/should not get a windfall by circumventing the requirements of the Fourth Amendment…thus, the exclusionary rule remedy.

Justified or Excused? The Basics of “Affirmative Defenses” in Criminal Cases in Florida

An “affirmative defense” is a defense which admits the cause of action, but avoids liability, in whole or in part, by alleging an excuse, justification, or other matter negating or limiting liability. In layman’s terms, “I did it, but my act is justified or excused.” If the defense is accepted by the jury, then the verdict must be “not guilty” because the entire criminal act is excused or justified (and, therefore, legally negated). If the defense is not accepted, the accused has admitted to all the elements of the offense (and usually convicted him or herself).